David S. Smith

Partner

David S. Smith

David S. Smith

Partner

​Phone: 978-744-8918 x2

E-mail: dsmith@fsofirm.com

Salem Office

27 Congress Street, Suite 508

Salem, MA 01970

See All Office Locations

Attorney David Smith provides legal services in maritime matters to various corporate and individual clients in Massachusetts and Maine. Additionally, he provides legal advice to many different types of business entities throughout Massachusetts in corporate formation, risk assessment, contracts, negotiations, and litigation. In terms of litigation, the types of cases attorney Smith handles include: Jones Act violations, Windfarm JV disputes, contract, vessel arrest, charters, collisions, partnership disputes, real estate, environmental clean-up matters and insurance coverage issues. Attorney Smith is admitted to practice before the courts for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and State of Maine, the United States District Court for the Districts of Massachusetts, Maine and Vermont, and the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.  He has also appeared in Florida and New Hampshire on a pro hac vice basis. 

Attorney Smith graduated as an engineer from Massachusetts Maritime Academy and sailed for several years, ultimately upgrading his U.S. Coast Guard 3rd Engineer’s License (Steam and Diesel Propulsion, Unlimited Horsepower) to a 2nd Engineer’s License (Steam Propulsion, Unlimited Horsepower). He has also sailed under a limited Master License. Attorney Smith lends an uncommon perspective to his clients. His unique maritime education and practical work experience have proven to be an invaluable combination in representing various clients involved in the marine industry.

Attorney Smith is the Co-founder and Past President of Sail Salem, Inc. a non-profit community boating center located on Winter Island in Salem, Massachusetts, as well as the CFO of the Massachusetts Maritime Academy Alumni Foundation. Attorney Smith is an adjunct professor at Massachusetts Maritime Academy for Masters in Maritime Business Management and Masters in Emergency Management programs. He has also taught the Admiralty Law Course at New England Law | Boston.

Practice Areas

  • Admiralty and Maritime Law
  • Failure to Detain Alien Crew
  • Jones Act Violations
  • Insurance Defense
  • Insurance Coverage
  • Corporate Formation
  • Corporate Governance
  • Contract Drafting
    • Shipbuilding​
    • Joint Venture Jones Act Compliant Companies
    • Charters
    • Vessel purchases and financing
    • Wharfinger Agreements
  • Oil Spills and Pollution
  • Salvage
  • USCG Regulatory and enforcement actions
  • NOAA/NMFS regulatory issues
  • Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Wharf permitting and development
  • Maritime Casualties
  • Vessel Arrests and Foreclosure
  • OSHA Violations
  • Subrogation Recovery
  • Product Liability

Admissions

  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts
  • State of Maine
  • U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts
  • U.S. District Court, District of Maine
  • U.S. District Court, District of Vermont
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit

Education

  • New England School of Law, J.D., 1996
  • Massachusetts Maritime Academy, B.S. Marine Engineering, 1989

Professional Affiliations & Bar Associations

  • The Maritime Law Association of the United States
  • Massachusetts Marine Trades Association
  • Connecticut Maritime Association
  • Massachusetts Bar Association

Work Highlights

  • Represent Greek vessel managers who were fined over $30,000,000 by U.S. Customs for alleged Jones Act violations for shipments of frozen fish.
  • Represented C&P Trawlers, LLC in the purchase of the Blue Harvest Fishery assets out of bankruptcy that included eight vessels and 48 state and federal fishing permits, representing about 13% of all Northeast groundfish permits or about 250 million pounds of quota.
  • Geico Marine Insurance Company v. Proetus Limited, D.Mass. Civil Action No.: 19-12544-WGY.  (The matter relates to questions involving insurance policy coverage under a Super Yacht Program providing hull and equipment insurance coverage for a 72’ sailing yacht named Proteus that lost its mast while out training for a race while the Captain was ashore having lunch in violation of the Policy’s Captain Warranty.)
  • Cape Waterman, Inc. d/b/a Sea Tow Cape & Islands v. M/V AVA PEARL (O.N. 1238374) and Rhode Island Fast Ferry, Inc., D.Mass. Civil Action No.: 19-10523-LTS (Obtain judgment in favor of a salvor against fast ferry who called “mayday” after she lost all engine power with passengers aboard.)
  • Burnham Associates, Inc. v. City of Beverly, D.Mass. Civil Action No.: 20-11114-GAO (Dredging company brought an action against the City for failing to pay charges due in a dredging contract after the Army Corp of Engineers failed to issue an Open-Water Disposal Approval Letter for the Massachusetts Bay Disposal Site.)
  • Yasi v. M/V HORIZON’S EDGE (O..N. 1092911), D.Mass. Civil Action No. 14-10128-DJC.  (Plaintiff was the first preferred mortgage holder and arrested the vessel for failing to pay its mortgage.  Seven years later, mortgage holders challenged the Plaintiff’s preferred status on the basis of equitable subordination and economic duress.  After the vessel was sold, Attorney Smith took the vessel through several sea trials with prospective buyers, one shipyard period, and removed the vessel’s gaming equipment cost effectively. The Plaintiff was the successful bidder at the U.S. Marshal’s auction.)
  • Farnsworth v. Towboat Nantucket Sound, Inc., 790 F.3d 90 (1st Cir. 2015)
  • Smith Marine, Inc. v. Kyle Conti Construction LLC, D. Mass. Civil Action No.11-11537-LTS (2013) (represented a tug and barge company in a breach of a time charter party for failure to pay hire.  The Delaware River charterer counterclaimed for breach of charter party and breach of the implied warranty of workmanlike performance.  The Court granted the tug and barge company’s summary judgment motion and held the charterer in breach, awarding hire based on all outstanding invoices plus 18% charter party prejudgment interest.  In a subsequent order, “considering the high quality of counsel’s written and oral advocacy in this action,” the Court awarded the tug and barge company all of its attorneys’ fees and costs too.”)

Contact David